
ViP
A Community Reference for International Conferences in the i-Field
The ViP (Venues for i-Field Publications) list as a community reference of widely recognized international conferences in the information field (i-Field). “Conference” is used as a simple umbrella term that also covers major annual meetings and similar scholarly gatherings with peer-reviewed full-paper publication.
​
In interdisciplinary fields such as the i-Field, it is not always easy to understand which international conferences are widely recognized as important, especially for researchers, schools, and evaluators working across disciplinary boundaries. The ViP list is intended to provide a shared reference point to help identify such conferences with indexed publications. Here, the i-Field is understood broadly as an interdisciplinary field concerned with information, people, technology, and society, and grounded in information science, LIS, and human-centered informatics. It is not limited to iSchools alone.​​
1. Scope, Use Cases, and What the List Is Not For
​
The list is designed to accommodate the fact that important conferences in the i-Field often emerge across disciplinary boundaries, rather than within a single established academic tradition.
The conferences in the list satisfy the core expectations for scholarly conferences in the field, including peer-reviewed full-paper publication, international scope, and sustained academic presence.
​
The list focuses on international conferences with indexed scholarly publications and is not intended to comprehensively represent all important domestic or country-specific conferences, or those whose significance lies primarily in professional practice, community-building, or other forms of impact beyond archival publications. Such conferences may be considered through complementary efforts in the future.
​
Use cases. Typical uses include: (i) helping researchers identify widely recognized international conferences in the i-Field; (ii) supporting researchers in explaining the significance of their conference publications across disciplinary boundaries; and (iii) encouraging broader cross-disciplinary participation by making important international conferences in the i-Field more visible and easier to navigate.
​
What the List Is Not For: (i) The ViP list is not designed to rank conferences. (ii) The ViP list is not intended to assess the quality of individual papers published in those conferences. (iii) The absence of a conference from the list should not be interpreted as a negative judgment on its value or quality. (iv) The list is not intended to replace local, disciplinary, or case-specific judgment in research evaluation.
​
2. Criteria for Inclusion
​
A conference is considered eligible for ViP when it satisfies the following core criteria:
C1. Relevance to the i-Field
The conference is clearly relevant to the i-Field, broadly defined, and attracts work that is recognized as part of the field or its closely related interdisciplinary domains.
​
C2. Scholarly significance
The conference is recognized as having clear scholarly value to the i-Field, even when it may also serve professional, practitioner, or community-building functions.
​
C3. Peer-reviewed full papers
The conference includes full research papers as a meaningful and recognized part of its scholarly output, and these papers are subject to peer review.
​
C4. Stable scholarly publication record
The conference has a stable record of indexed scholarly publications, typically through proceedings or a comparable archival record.
​
C5. Internationality
The conference demonstrates meaningful international reach in participation, leadership, visibility, or community recognition.
​
A conference that satisfies C1–C5 may be included in ViP.
​
Additional notation within ViP: ViP+
​
Within the ViP list, a conference may be marked as ViP+ when, in addition to satisfying C1–C5, it also satisfies the following more specific criteria:
​
C6. Review practices
The conference is recognized as having comparatively rigorous review practices for full papers, typically involving multiple reviewers and a structured selection process.
​
C7. Recognized role within its area
The conference is widely recognized as playing a central scholarly publication role within its thematic area.
3. Important Notes
​
The ViP list is intended as a community reference resource and should not be interpreted as a definitive judgment about conference quality.
​
The i-Field is broad, international, and evolving. No list can perfectly represent all communities, regions, publication cultures, and interdisciplinary boundaries. The list should therefore be understood as a living community resource, to be refined over time through continued discussion and feedback.
​
Updates and feedback. We welcome feedback and suggestions for future revisions. Proposed additions (with a brief rationale and supporting information) may be submitted to the ViP Committee, and will be considered in subsequent updates as the framework evolves.
​​
4. ViP List
​
The list below is presented in alphabetical order and does not imply ranking.
​
-
ViP — ALISE (Association for Library and Information Science Education)
-
ViP — AMCIS (Americas Conference on Information Systems)
-
ViP — AP-iConference
-
ViP+ — ASIS&T Annual Meeting (Association for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting)
-
ViP+ — CHI (ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems)
-
ViP — CHIIR (Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval)
-
ViP+ — CIKM (ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management)
-
ViP — CoLIS (International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science)
-
ViP+ — CSCW (ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing)
-
ViP — DCMI Conference (Dublin Core Metadata Initiative Conference)
-
ViP+ — ECIR (European Conference on Information Retrieval)
-
ViP — ECIS (European Conference on Information Systems)
-
ViP+ — ICADL (International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries)
-
ViP+ — ICIS (International Conference on Information Systems)
-
ViP+ — iConference
-
ViP — ISIC (Information Seeking in Context)
-
ViP+ — ISSI Conference (International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics)
-
ViP+ — JCDL (ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries)
-
ViP — PACIS (Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems)
-
ViP+ — SIGIR (ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval)
-
ViP+ — TPDL (International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries)
5. Contributors
​
The ViP list initiative emerged through extensive discussions within AP iSchools to advance the interdisciplinary i-Field. The framework was developed by the ViP Committee and the proposed conferences were further reviewed by external advisors from inside and outside the iSchools community across different regions. External advisors are not responsible for the completeness of the list; final decisions and overall coverage remain the responsibility of the committee.
5.1 ViP Committee
​
-
Atsuyuki Morishima, University of Tsukuba (co-chair)
-
Lihong Zhou, Wuhan University (co-chair)
-
Gaohui Cao, Central China Normal University
-
Jun Deng, Jilin University
-
Joanne Evans, Monash University
-
Norhayati Hussin, Universiti Teknologi MARA
-
Emi Ishita, Kyushu University
-
Lele Kang, Nanjing University
-
Youngseek Kim, Sungkyunkwan University
-
Chei Sian Lee, Nanyang Technological University
-
Lan Thi Nguyen, Khon Kaen University
-
Chunxiu Qin, Xidian University
-
Ming Ren, Renmin University of China
-
Lihua Wang, Shanghai University
-
Joseph Yap, University of the Philippines Diliman
5.2 External Advisors
​
-
Lu An, Wuhan University
-
Jennifer Campbell-Meier, Victoria University of Wellington
-
Songphan Choemprayong, Chulalongkorn University
-
Gobinda Chowdhury, University of Strathclyde
-
Anind K. Dey, University of Washington
-
J. Stephen Downie, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
-
Koraljka Golub, Linnaeus University
-
Adam Jatowt, University of Innsbruck
-
Tingting Jiang, Wuhan University
-
Min-Yen Kan, National University of Singapore
-
Yuenan Liu. Renmin University of China
-
Sam Oh, Sungkyunkwan University
-
Benedict Salazar Olgado, University of the Philippines
-
Gillian Oliver, Monash University
-
Natalie Pang, National University of Singapore
-
Michael Seadle, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
-
Shigeo Sugimoto, University of Tsukuba
-
Daryl L. Superio, Northern Iloilo State University
-
Chengzhi Zhang, Nanjing University of Science and Technology
-
Qinghua Zhu, Nanjing University
Questions
Feel free to contact us anytime if you have questions: admin@ischools-inc.org
​​​
​
​